Community IPM in Tulang Bawang Udik,

Lampung Province, Indonesia

 

Farming Practices

IPM alumni have changed their approach to farming after training.  These changes set them apart from non-IPM trained farmers.  Basic practices that have changed among all IPM alumni include the addition of weekly field observations for the purpose of taking field management decisions, the application rates of fertilizer, and the reduction in applications of pesticides. 

Fertilizer Use.  Table 1, below, shows what farmers were doing regarding fertilisation prior to attending an IPM Field School.  There was a heavy reliance on the use of urea among these farmers.  Most IPM alumni also made frequent and relatively heavy use of ZA, another source of nitrogen for plants.

Table 1. Farmer Practices among Alumni before Training

Name

 Fertilizer Use (kg/Ha)

Pesticide

Applications

Yields

(t/Ha)

Urea

KCL

TSP

ZA

Juwadi

250

100

150

0

4

4.5

Miran

300

150

100

100

5

4.2

Madkur

250

100

100

100

4

4.5

Paidi

250

100

150

100

12

4.5

Ngarianto

200

60

70

0

6

4.0

Suratijo

250

50

150

0

4

5.0

Paiman

200

50

100

50

8

5.0

Tarmo

200

100

150

0

3

4.4

Marno

200

100

150

50

3

4.3

Tumijan

200

200

150

0

4

4.2

avg.

230

101

127

40

5.3

4.5

After training, see Table 2, below, on average, there is a significant shift away from nitrogen in the form of ZA and urea with a slight increase in the use of KCL and an accompanying decrease in the use of TSP.  Three farmers have begun to look to composted manure and other organic materials for both nitrogen and an improved micro-organism base.

Table 2. Farming Practices among Alumni after Training

Name

 Fertilizer Use (kg/Ha)

Compost

Pesticide

Applications

Yield

(t/Ha)

Urea

KCL

TSP

ZA

Juwadi

100

100

150

0

yes

0

6.0

Miran

150

150

100

0

no

0

4.5

Madkur

100

150

100

0

yes

0

5.6

Paidi

150

0

150

150

yes

0

5.6

Ngarianto

200

60

70

0

no

0

4.0

Suratijo

250

50

150

0

no

0

5.4

Paiman

200

50

100

50

no

0

5.1

Tarmo

200

200

100

0

no

0

5.2

Marno

200

150

100

0

no

0

4.8

Tumijan

200

200

150

0

no

0

4.5

avg.

175

111

117

20

 

0

5.1

Thus IPM alumni show a change in their rates of fertilizer application which follows the more balanced approach which they learned while participating in IPM Field Schools.  This might be one of the reasons for the average increase in yield per hectare shown among IPM alumni that were interviewed.  Yield rates increased from an average of 4.5 tons per hectare to 5.1 tons per hectare among these farmers.

Lower Pesticide Use.  The alumni that were interviewed are no longer using pesticides. With reference to the above tables concerning farmer practices, alumni made and average of 5.3 applications of pesticides prior to attending Field Schools.  The average was zero for the last season.

Financial Position Improved

The tables showing farming practices allow for the use of a partial budget to analyse the impact of IPM on the finances of farmers.  Using prices suggested by farmers in the sub-district a partial budget analysis examines the changes made by farmers and the resulting changes in income. Alumni changed their fertilisation practices and their use of pesticides.  These are the changes to which we can assign costs.  The use of compost has not required any cash outlay so it has been disregarded.  On the output side, yields have gone up.  The increase in income because of these increased yields plus or minus the decreases or increases to expenses will reveal how remunerative the changes have been to the farmers that made them.

Table 3. Partial Budget: Analysis of Financial Impact of Changed Practices by IPM Alumni Because of Participation in IPM Field Schools

 

Urea

KCL

TSP

ZA

Pesticide

Fertilizer

+

Pesticide

Yield

(t/Ha)

Income

Change

(@ 420/kg)

Income

Change +/-

Cost Change

Pre-FFS

    92,000