|
Community
IPM in Tulang Bawang Udik,
Lampung
Province, Indonesia
Farming Practices
IPM alumni have changed their approach to farming after
training. These changes set
them apart from non-IPM trained farmers. Basic practices that have changed
among all IPM alumni include the addition of weekly field observations for
the purpose of taking field management decisions, the application rates of
fertilizer, and the reduction in applications of pesticides.
Fertilizer Use.
Table 1, below, shows what farmers were doing regarding
fertilisation prior to attending an IPM Field School. There was a heavy reliance on the
use of urea among these farmers.
Most IPM alumni also made frequent and relatively heavy use of ZA,
another source of nitrogen for plants.
Table 1. Farmer
Practices among Alumni before Training
|
Name
|
Fertilizer Use (kg/Ha)
|
Pesticide
Applications
|
Yields
(t/Ha)
|
|
Urea
|
KCL
|
TSP
|
ZA
|
|
Juwadi
|
250
|
100
|
150
|
0
|
4
|
4.5
|
|
Miran
|
300
|
150
|
100
|
100
|
5
|
4.2
|
|
Madkur
|
250
|
100
|
100
|
100
|
4
|
4.5
|
|
Paidi
|
250
|
100
|
150
|
100
|
12
|
4.5
|
|
Ngarianto
|
200
|
60
|
70
|
0
|
6
|
4.0
|
|
Suratijo
|
250
|
50
|
150
|
0
|
4
|
5.0
|
|
Paiman
|
200
|
50
|
100
|
50
|
8
|
5.0
|
|
Tarmo
|
200
|
100
|
150
|
0
|
3
|
4.4
|
|
Marno
|
200
|
100
|
150
|
50
|
3
|
4.3
|
|
Tumijan
|
200
|
200
|
150
|
0
|
4
|
4.2
|
|
avg.
|
230
|
101
|
127
|
40
|
5.3
|
4.5
|
After training, see Table 2, below, on average, there is
a significant shift away from nitrogen in the form of ZA and urea with a
slight increase in the use of KCL and an accompanying decrease in the use
of TSP. Three farmers have
begun to look to composted manure and other organic materials for both
nitrogen and an improved micro-organism base.
Table 2. Farming
Practices among Alumni after Training
|
Name |
Fertilizer Use
(kg/Ha) |
Compost |
Pesticide
Applications |
Yield
(t/Ha) |
|
Urea |
KCL |
TSP |
ZA |
|
Juwadi |
100 |
100 |
150 |
0 |
yes |
0 |
6.0 |
|
Miran |
150 |
150 |
100 |
0 |
no |
0 |
4.5 |
|
Madkur |
100 |
150 |
100 |
0 |
yes |
0 |
5.6 |
|
Paidi |
150 |
0 |
150 |
150 |
yes |
0 |
5.6 |
|
Ngarianto |
200 |
60 |
70 |
0 |
no |
0 |
4.0 |
|
Suratijo |
250 |
50 |
150 |
0 |
no |
0 |
5.4 |
|
Paiman |
200 |
50 |
100 |
50 |
no |
0 |
5.1 |
|
Tarmo |
200 |
200 |
100 |
0 |
no |
0 |
5.2 |
|
Marno |
200 |
150 |
100 |
0 |
no |
0 |
4.8 |
|
Tumijan |
200 |
200 |
150 |
0 |
no |
0 |
4.5 |
|
avg. |
175 |
111 |
117 |
20 |
|
0 |
5.1
|
Thus IPM alumni show a change in their rates of
fertilizer application which follows the more balanced approach which they
learned while participating in IPM Field Schools. This might be one of the reasons
for the average increase in yield per hectare shown among IPM alumni that
were interviewed. Yield rates
increased from an average of 4.5 tons per hectare to 5.1 tons per hectare
among these farmers.
Lower Pesticide Use. The alumni that were interviewed
are no longer using pesticides. With reference to the above tables
concerning farmer practices, alumni made and average of 5.3 applications
of pesticides prior to attending Field Schools. The average was zero for the last
season.
Financial
Position Improved
The
tables showing farming practices allow for the use of a partial budget to
analyse the impact of IPM on the finances of farmers. Using prices suggested by farmers
in the sub-district a partial budget analysis examines the changes made by
farmers and the resulting changes in income. Alumni changed their
fertilisation practices and their use of pesticides. These are the changes to which we
can assign costs. The use of
compost has not required any cash outlay so it has been disregarded. On the output side, yields have
gone up. The increase in
income because of these increased yields plus or minus the decreases or
increases to expenses will reveal how remunerative the changes have been
to the farmers that made them.
Table
3. Partial Budget: Analysis of Financial Impact of Changed
Practices
by IPM Alumni Because of Participation in IPM Field
Schools
|
|
Urea
|
KCL
|
TSP
|
ZA
|
Pesticide
|
Fertilizer
+
Pesticide
|
Yield
(t/Ha)
|
Income
Change
(@
420/kg) |
Income
Change
+/-
Cost
Change |
|
Pre-FFS
|
92,000 |
| |